Comparison of Two Presidents

Quote of the day:
“A man's silence is wonderful to listen to.”
--Thomas Hardy

The San Diego wildfires brought to mind a specific difference between Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

When Hurricane Katrina destroyed much of southern Louisiana, and after southern California’s wildfires, Bush waited for “the appropriate time” to visit. He waited for an invitation, and for a careful choreography of his visit to be prepared.

After Hurricane Andrew hit Florida in 1999, President Clinton was on site in short order, showing compassion and making clear that federal help would be available. He did not wait to be invited, or for “the right time.” He just went.

For a United States president, which is preferable? A passive, wait for proper procedures approach? Or an active, commander-and-chief-executive approach, short-circuiting permission and protocol?

Which is the better way to go when lots of Americans are in danger or in trouble?